Fuchsia-info Magazine

b-66-Home 3kB.gif (2657 bytes)               b-67-Back 3kB.gif (2427 bytes)

 

24. Has there been a triphylla with a blue corolla?

c-22-Nederl vlag 1kB.gif (864 bytes) To Dutch version

J24- Fuchsias Lamarck 57kB.jpg (58509 bytes)

Pict.1

,.

During surfing along the internet after'antique botanical fuchsia prints'  I find sometimes remarkable plates. So I found recently the 'double print', of which the here omited upper part (see Pict. 4) reproduces the detailed drawings of a Combretum. The subsription by the plate is: 1782 Lamarck/De Seve - Fuchsia plate 282 in Encyclopédie Méthodique.                         
With the fuchsia print on the lowest part of the plate (see above Pict. 1) I suppose there is something remarkable the matter. The flower details in the middle I had seen allready before on a found plate. There are standing namely details of the in 1703 first found fuchsia by Plumier, which is pictured in 'Nova Plantarum Americanum Genera' . Linnaeus has renamed this plant lateron in his'Species Plantarum' (1753) Fuchsia triphylla flore coccinea (Pict 2). A stem with flower of this species is standing to the left on this plate.The most remarkable on the plate (Pict.1 and 3) is the blue corolla, while by fuchsialovers there isn't known a triphylla with a  blue crown.

.

To the right there is drawn an other fuchsia species and observing the long stamens, that must be of a F. magellanica macrostemma. That was the species that was  the as 'second found fuchsia'. Following plate 47 in 'Journal des Observations Botaniques', Vol. III from 1725 the author of it is Père R.P.L.Feuillé. In literature Lamarck is named as the author of F.magellanica (1788). This is also the only fuchsia species, which is attributed to him as author. But while plate Pict.3 dates of 1782, the species F.magellanica (1788) cann't been used for drawing it after. So I think the real author of F.magellanica. is Feuillé.
Remarkable is also that in literature on internet I could nowhere read that Lamarck in the period he studied botanic, has made a study tour to America.
J24-lamarck1 18kB.gif (17818 bytes)
Jean Baptiste Antoine Pierre Monet de Lamarck (1744 - 1829)  was  an excellent French physical. He takes up office in military service, but short after that he studied medical and physical science. Ater that he has been busy a considerable time with atmospherical science, he spent his time to botany. And bear in mind a new way to classify the plants. However, his classifying met not approval, so he put it into practice in his   'Flore Francaise' (1780, 3 volumes; 2e edition 1793), This is lateron rewrited by Decandolle.
Afterthat he had delivered the first two volumes for the botanical devision of 'Encyclopedie méthodique' from publisherPanckoucke, and he had ordered the continueing of two other herbalist editions to Poiret en Mirbel , he changed the 'botany' by the 'zoology'.
He became in 1792 professor in physical history in the  Jardin des Plantes. Important books he has realised about zoology, are'Histoire naturelle des animaux san vertebres'(1816-1822, 7 volumes). His philosophic feelings about the nature he has fastened in the volume'Philosophie zoölogique' (1809, two volumes).

The 'Encyclopedie Méthodique' is with 206 volumes and  125.350 pages one of the largest French encyclopedies. Many of the botanical prints in it are made by famous artists as H.J. Redoute, Jacques De Seve, L.Fossier and Nicolas Marechal. In  literature there is to read that sometimes hand-coloured plates are not worked out in 'original way'. It concerned namely here an encyclopedie, and that means often 'drawing after' from prints made before, mostly of other artists,

J24-Encyclopedie Methodique 65kB.jpg (66320 bytes)

,

Creating mistakes handcolouring

The before named original plates, of which the fuchsias in Pict.1  are drawn after, were pictures in 'black and white', see Pict.2 and 4.. That the triphylla qua tubus and sepalen are coloured in by De Seve (his name is standing with little letters under the plate) with red, is caused by the renaming by Linneus of the name of species Triphylla in Fuchsia triphylla flore coccinea, by which the meaning of coccinea = red. While there were in Europe in 1782 only fuchsia species  imported with red tubus/sepals and blue corolla (F.magellanica  en F.coccinea), it is very well possible, that the corolla of the triphylla on Plate 282 in Encyclopedie Méthodique  therefore also is coloured in with blue. With this to me plausible explanation, has understanding antique botanical plate become a very remarkable mistake.

In the above mentioned facts, we can also conclude that Lamarck wasn't the first, who found F.magellanica . So it has been Feuillé with F.magellanica macrostema.

.

 

 

 

J18-Fuchsia in Nova Plantarum 1703 27kB.jpg (27132 bytes)

 

J19-115.Fuchsia Lamarck plate 282.jpg (132005 bytes)

 

 

J18-Journal des Observations 1725 12kB.jpg (12856 bytes)

3.F.tryphilla (Tryphilla flore coccinea) - Auteur P.Carolo Plumier, in 'Nova Plantarum Americanum genera (1703)

4.Combretum (above) and Fuchsias (under) on Plate 282 in Encyclopédie Méthodique (1782-1832)

5.F.magellanica macrostema - Auteur R.P.L.Feuillé, Plate 47 in Journal des Observations Botaniques Vol. III (1725)

.

'Gelderse Fuchsia Info-site'- november 2008 

b-68-Next 3kB.gif (2469 bytes)